13:13:52 <tomman_> time to add the NY Times to my blocklist
13:14:25 <tomman_> it's the second time a NY Times page crashes SeaMonkey this month
14:32:20 <nsITobin> finally after how many years I have figured out how to use this damn service.. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mattatobin/el8-updates/packages/
14:33:37 <frg_Away> hi nsITobin
14:33:43 <nsITobin> good morning frg_Away
14:42:25 <nsITobin> so anything anyone wants for updated RPMs?
14:43:17 <frg_Away> nope here
14:48:09 <nsITobin> only thing I can think of bigger than some rando util i am forgetting is wine32 but conforming that to copr from the instructions is gonna take more research..
16:25:44 <nsITobin> hello buc
16:26:44 <buc> nsITobin: for wine32 you can consider how the similar was done for epel7 here: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/
16:27:06 <buc> (el7 had wine64 only too)
16:27:29 <nsITobin> https://forum.level1techs.com/t/32-bit-wine-for-centos-8/151800
16:27:38 <nsITobin> is what I used locally
16:28:28 <buc> Oh, fine!
16:29:15 <nsITobin> i was lucky to come across that
16:30:14 <nsITobin> why wouldn't it allow building 32bit packages copr has multilib support
16:31:28 <nsITobin> knew i reconized the nick stenstorp
16:33:21 <buc> Hmm, it seems that Fedora still supports (at least formally) to build wine on %{ix86} arches. See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wine/blob/rawhide/f/wine.spec#_181
16:34:08 <nsITobin> yeah it was a shock to find it wasn't on el .. 32bit windows is likely a major point people on el using wine would expect
16:34:19 <nsITobin> cause likely some legacy program
16:34:34 <nsITobin> not many win64 legacy programs ;)
16:34:57 <buc> And Fedora-28 (which el8 is based on) has some 32-bit stuff: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wine/tree/f28
16:35:48 <buc> Probably this f28 branch could be yet another start point to try etc.
16:36:35 <nsITobin> buc: is el8 rpmbuild bugged where if there isn't a trailing new line in a spec file it has .. odd behavior
16:36:56 <nsITobin> cause I see that locally and on copr
16:37:26 <buc> No idea. All my text files have the trailing newline... :) :) :)
16:37:37 <nsITobin> the stuff in fedora rpm repos does not
16:37:39 <nsITobin> tho
16:38:04 <nsITobin> and some have autogenerated stuff
16:38:17 <buc> bug or warning?
16:38:40 <nsITobin> as in unexpected strange behavior
16:39:04 <nsITobin> without a newline strange cpp build errors with a new line fine in all srpm files there is always new line
16:39:50 <nsITobin> also where are fedora's update source rpms?
16:40:40 <njsg> lack of a newline on which kind of file?
16:40:47 <nsITobin> spec file
16:44:14 <nsITobin> i found the updates repos
16:55:01 <nsITobin> buc: btw wine 9 busted the common dialog on fedora 39 i had to downgrade to 8.. now I am on 6 and it runs my couple of windows programs fine
18:57:38 <nsITobin> frg_Away: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mattatobin/el8-updates/package/rustup-init/
20:17:45 <frg_Away> nsITobin stupid question. Are these needed for a new build?