12:58:33 nsITobin: hey OK so I have landed your about redirector stuff on 253 gitlab queus which is puthsin it on the way to landing on comm-central 13:04:57 Good morning WG9s, that's good news 13:10:49 on the other hand your patch for TOP-unrestricted-comm-build-and-sandbox-dllblklstoop.patch was rejected so tried to do a patch might me more acceptable 13:11:22 I think the issue was they were trying to restrict what apps could bypass this restirction that they condiered to be a security thing 13:12:34 so although you were treating this a s you ann OPT into doing this. they teated it as opting out of shat they condered to be a security restriction 13:13:38 so issue is anyone can make up a new app in comm theat woudl be able to avoid the restirction and nothing needs to be reviewed but the people who invoked the security protection 13:14:26 so anyway i landed your cahnge on gitlab but insted of anyting in comm acn opt in or out it is just comm/suite is permitted so 13:14:40 well THAT patch can't go to central 13:14:43 its a top patch 13:14:43 the comm-release is also no longer required 13:15:38 yes but don;t want to ahve a seamonkey ptch that is dependent on a moz-central aptch that will never be able to land 13:16:14 well it won't ever land because Mozilla is blocking me so I gave up 13:16:27 and if they won't approve a patch that lallows any comm-central app to do this I don;t think we need to do that either 13:16:29 but I did split the patches out 13:17:40 you guys may be able to get it landed.. but I wanted it to be something *i* did on my own to see if it was possible.. its not and the 2fa thing is just a pretense 13:17:54 waht I think we need to do is to make this al way simpler than it is on the mozilla side have a list of values for MOZ_BUILD_APP that are permitted to do this 13:18:12 WG9s: that still means the list is one of approved applications 13:18:22 it violates Mozilla's original mission statement 13:18:55 that was my idea they weem to think this is a security thing so want to be in the approval process. Just trying to work within the system. 23:41:58 WOW 23:42:06 mastodon.social now renders properly again! 23:42:33 i thought you were just shocked I didn't fill the channel with idle chatter 23:42:40 but does it? 23:42:43 tomman: 23:43:18 dunno if it was the fact I updated the nightly last week, or that some webshit reverted some Shiny Squirrel™ (haha, a man can dream) 23:43:44 you will have to do progressive testing to see what broke what 23:43:58 i am gonna start saying exactly that 23:44:00 lol 23:44:37 well that's good they either fixed their crap or frg did one of the two 23:44:48 fixed is always so much better than broken 23:45:55 I couldn't even tell what broken, because it wasn't JavaScript (or at least devtools didn't caught anything) 23:46:01 most likely it was some CSS dogvomit