12:24:19 this screenshot is the setup i always wanted to take adantage of both windows and linux.. shame it has a timelimit on it unless I can create it from the ground up my self https://i.ibb.co/k9NTJ21/image.png 12:39:55 frg_Away: is there a reason beyond haven't got to it yet that comm on top is being maintained in build config? 12:40:59 nsITobin no mostly just leftovers I think. No longer works 12:48:21 mind if I clean it out? 13:15:55 nsITobin I think I did in suite. Wanted to check TB patches for the remaining parts. 13:16:22 1816266 13:16:26 it seems 13:16:33 really none of this is required 13:16:43 i am surprised thunderbird didn't remove all of it 13:17:00 but they kept the commtopsrcdir part 13:17:45 there must be a tooling advantage cause basic release enginering would not matter 13:17:49 Happy if you backport relevant parts and we will then see what is left. 13:20:28 well my instinct is to just take a push broom and shove it all out the door but following the bug first is a better idea because I need to get the TB parts as well and why search when the patch is here.. I know where the files are.. least I should lol 13:21:19 patch..es 13:21:20 lol 13:21:46 I alo wondered some time ago why there were leftovers. But they didn't break anything so just abstained doing something 13:28:18 I honestly don't know why comm isn't just remerged into mozilla-central and maybe that's why .. if they get merged back in for being good little boys and girls it would make it easier to resume being /mail 13:29:19 the fantasy of "the firefox codebase by mozilla" remains laughable as long as Thunderbird exists and is building right along side 13:32:05 I predict the following will happen (oh joy predictions) that once suite is out of cc and mailnews calendar et all is merged into mail/ then mail/ will be merged into mozilla-central as a reunified mozilla to prove they never caused any division in the first place. 13:32:54 if it doesn't bankrupt first 13:32:56 that is 13:34:38 ugh i wish they had desinated part numbers to these patches cause some of it removes rdfs we need 13:36:42 I usually enter the bbug number in thg for multipart patches in the filter field. Then I just export them all into the reight patches directory and dd them to the series manually. Makes sure I gt the latet versions and pretty easy to do. 13:36:59 ^right patches directory 13:37:02 how do you resolve conflicts? 13:37:25 doesn't it generate a bunch of rejection files and such 13:37:44 hg qpush -v -> edit rejects -> hg qrefresh Now and then compare now and then with the original. 13:38:08 on git rejects are a nightmare 13:38:41 pretty easy with mq 13:39:06 Only renames or copies with changes to the file are problematic. 13:39:21 mozilla does a lot of that tho lol 13:39:39 If too many rejects I just do hg qpop and try to find missing prerequisites 13:46:47 well after diving in for weeks tangibly.. i see a million things that can be done and that is not including the more practical bits like build system, rust, and webcompat 13:49:12 this is not a bad thing btw.. just helps prove there is still something in all this 13:55:13 yeah I "juggle" around these things too. 14:05:08 well now that I have regained vmware virtualization on linux and my windows vm is running acceptably well.. as long as that stays working my capabilities are only limited by time and energy 16:34:35 well composer has issues 16:35:05 it is not disabling inline spellchecking in most modes 16:42:02 ok now it is 16:45:43 oh that's funny domi messes up composer 16:45:45 somehow 17:27:31 so someone felt it very important to one, get access to an amazon box two navigate to binaryoutcast.com three hit the link to irc, and four type in the nickname "tobin_is_a_fat" and join and then close the page. Meanwhile I am doing a private --disable-mailnews patch because its some psycological obsession i guess 17:28:31 which may explain them lol 17:31:48 speaking of frg_Away have you attempted managing multiple patchqueues? 17:32:04 i mean on the same repo 17:33:02 no. Not supported and would mean a qpop qpush --all when renaming the ptches directory. 17:33:14 ^patches directory 18:53:17 https://www.jwz.org/blog/2024/08/gmails-absolutely-horrific-markup-and-how-chrome-makes-it-worse/ ha, he should look at what HTML markup generates LibreOffice 18:53:33 ...but then he will blame "open soures" 18:53:36 --"open sores" 18:53:52 "So, first things first, if your application produces markup like that, please leave the software industry immediately. Your work is a net negative on everyone's lives. Tools down, walk away. " 19:05:22 tomman: LibreOffice? no. there's nothing that compares to MSWord, I'd say 19:05:39 I think the StarOffice codebase actually outputs sane-looking code compared to Word 19:05:55 Which is amazing, because it's not like Office lacked a web page editor... 19:06:26 nsITobin: how is DOMi having trouble with composer? 19:06:35 As someone that used to model webapp reports in OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice, then exporting them to HTML, I had to spend quite a lot of time cleaning CSS junk 19:06:50 but yeah, MS Office is far worse with its proprietary IE-only VML crap 19:06:58 not to mention outright broken CSS 19:07:58 and a lot of Office-specific junk because the Office team decided to figure out how to encode Excel metadata (formulas, etc) in HTML, should nobody want to edit the generated file as a Excel book again 19:09:07 maybe they're just not cleaning up, as it nowadays is XML. I really have not much of an idea 19:09:41 last I used MS Office, the main format was still CDF (which I still rank as the most widely supported one) 19:10:01 last I used MS office, you could have a cat in the screen 19:10:19 * njsg goes look for photos of said cat in the screen with cats on the screen too 22:07:14 njsg: I dunno exactly 22:07:37 i was inspecting how the editor widget worked and somehow it stopped responding to commands and such being dispatched like disable spellchecker 22:07:50 closed it opened it seems fine (without domi focused on it) 22:08:14 the second time i couldn't even switch views 22:08:15 hm, if you ever get in that situation again, make sure the editor has focus, and a blinking cursor 22:08:36 and check the error console for any errors 22:09:18 it stopped producing errors the second time things would just not do anythinh the first time a slew of errors happened but i didn't catch them properly 22:09:25 there is an issue with how commands are handled, they're "bound", I think, to the editor, not the window, so some commands don't work if the editor is not selected 22:09:27 i will be on the lookout for it doing it again tho 22:09:46 njsg: being nearly still xpfe in design and all that? 22:10:34 window.content, actually https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687482#c3 22:10:51 so it's possible that was the command problem, unless you're sure it had focus 22:11:37 not switching views, I'd expect it to be an error in the mode change code, but that's just a guess 22:54:02 sorry njsg tacos happened 22:54:10 i am back now 23:05:13 https://www.wpsdlocal6.com/news/kentucky-news/flood-damage-at-noah-s-ark-attraction-in-kentucky/article_2fbe0543-317f-57a5-8731-6b4750a1935b.html no bug to report here, but do notice the tag on that site 23:05:40 <tomman> someone tried to serve HTML there... why?! 23:05:45 <tomman> but it gets better: <title>Flood damage at Noah’s Ark attraction in Kentucky | <span class="tnt-section-tag no-link">Kentucky News</span> | WPSD Local 6 23:05:54 how considerate of them, they escaped it :P 23:06:11 no, wait, WHY THERE IS HTML-LIKE CODE INSIDE A TAG!? 23:06:23 <tomman> "So, first things first, if your application produces markup like that, please leave the software industry immediately. Your work is a net negative on everyone's lives. Tools down, walk away. " 23:06:28 <tomman> Thanks, Zawinski! 23:17:57 <nsITobin> lol 23:18:01 <nsITobin> Tirili: 23:18:17 <nsITobin> er 23:18:20 <nsITobin> tomman: 23:19:16 <tomman> wonder if such a markup can be exploitable on specific *nix desktop environments 23:19:23 <tomman> or cellphone junk 23:25:46 <njsg> tomman: I'm guessing some rule grabbed the in-content title to make the title, and then the markup was updated to have more spans.... 23:26:31 <njsg> uh, funny 23:26:50 <njsg> metadata doesn't show the same for other title-like fields (Page info dialog, first tab) 23:27:17 <njsg> I was wondering if this could maybe be "it works for facebook etc" 23:38:16 <nsITobin> here is an icon I and an autocomplete chatbot made https://i.ibb.co/ZGMLX28/image.png