this screenshot is the setup i always wanted to take adantage of both windows and linux.. shame it has a timelimit on it unless I can create it from the ground up my self i.ibb.co/k9NTJ21/image.png

frg_Away: is there a reason beyond haven't got to it yet that comm on top is being maintained in build config?

nsITobin no mostly just leftovers I think. No longer works

mind if I clean it out?

nsITobin I think I did in suite. Wanted to check TB patches for the remaining parts.

1816266

it seems

really none of this is required

i am surprised thunderbird didn't remove all of it

but they kept the commtopsrcdir part

there must be a tooling advantage cause basic release enginering would not matter

Happy if you backport relevant parts and we will then see what is left.

well my instinct is to just take a push broom and shove it all out the door but following the bug first is a better idea because I need to get the TB parts as well and why search when the patch is here.. I know where the files are.. least I should lol

patch..es

lol

I alo wondered some time ago why there were leftovers. But they didn't break anything so just abstained doing something

I honestly don't know why comm isn't just remerged into mozilla-central and maybe that's why .. if they get merged back in for being good little boys and girls it would make it easier to resume being /mail

the fantasy of "the firefox codebase by mozilla" remains laughable as long as Thunderbird exists and is building right along side

I predict the following will happen (oh joy predictions) that once suite is out of cc and mailnews calendar et all is merged into mail/ then mail/ will be merged into mozilla-central as a reunified mozilla to prove they never caused any division in the first place.

if it doesn't bankrupt first

that is

ugh i wish they had desinated part numbers to these patches cause some of it removes rdfs we need

I usually enter the bbug number in thg for multipart patches in the filter field. Then I just export them all into the reight patches directory and dd them to the series manually. Makes sure I gt the latet versions and pretty easy to do.

^right patches directory

how do you resolve conflicts?

doesn't it generate a bunch of rejection files and such

hg qpush -v -> edit rejects -> hg qrefresh Now and then compare now and then with the original.

on git rejects are a nightmare

pretty easy with mq

Only renames or copies with changes to the file are problematic.

mozilla does a lot of that tho lol

If too many rejects I just do hg qpop and try to find missing prerequisites

well after diving in for weeks tangibly.. i see a million things that can be done and that is not including the more practical bits like build system, rust, and webcompat

this is not a bad thing btw.. just helps prove there is still something in all this

yeah I "juggle" around these things too.

well now that I have regained vmware virtualization on linux and my windows vm is running acceptably well.. as long as that stays working my capabilities are only limited by time and energy

well composer has issues

it is not disabling inline spellchecking in most modes

ok now it is

oh that's funny domi messes up composer

somehow

so someone felt it very important to one, get access to an amazon box two navigate to binaryoutcast.com three hit the link to irc, and four type in the nickname "tobin_is_a_fat" and join and then close the page. Meanwhile I am doing a private --disable-mailnews patch because its some psycological obsession i guess

which may explain them lol

speaking of frg_Away have you attempted managing multiple patchqueues?

i mean on the same repo

no. Not supported and would mean a qpop qpush --all when renaming the ptches directory.

^patches directory

jwz.org/blog/2024/08/gmails-absolut…arkup-and-how-chrome-makes-it-worse ha, he should look at what HTML markup generates LibreOffice

...but then he will blame "open soures"

--"open sores"

"So, first things first, if your application produces markup like that, please leave the software industry immediately. Your work is a net negative on everyone's lives. Tools down, walk away. "

tomman: LibreOffice? no. there's nothing that compares to MSWord, I'd say

I think the StarOffice codebase actually outputs sane-looking code compared to Word

Which is amazing, because it's not like Office lacked a web page editor...

nsITobin: how is DOMi having trouble with composer?

As someone that used to model webapp reports in OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice, then exporting them to HTML, I had to spend quite a lot of time cleaning CSS junk

but yeah, MS Office is far worse with its proprietary IE-only VML crap

not to mention outright broken CSS

and a lot of Office-specific junk because the Office team decided to figure out how to encode Excel metadata (formulas, etc) in HTML, should nobody want to edit the generated file as a Excel book again

maybe they're just not cleaning up, as it nowadays is XML. I really have not much of an idea

last I used MS Office, the main format was still CDF (which I still rank as the most widely supported one)

last I used MS office, you could have a cat in the screen

njsg: I dunno exactly

i was inspecting how the editor widget worked and somehow it stopped responding to commands and such being dispatched like disable spellchecker

closed it opened it seems fine (without domi focused on it)

the second time i couldn't even switch views

hm, if you ever get in that situation again, make sure the editor has focus, and a blinking cursor

and check the error console for any errors

it stopped producing errors the second time things would just not do anythinh the first time a slew of errors happened but i didn't catch them properly

there is an issue with how commands are handled, they're "bound", I think, to the editor, not the window, so some commands don't work if the editor is not selected

i will be on the lookout for it doing it again tho

njsg: being nearly still xpfe in design and all that?

window.content, actually bugzilla.mozilla.org/687482#c3

so it's possible that was the command problem, unless you're sure it had focus

not switching views, I'd expect it to be an error in the mode change code, but that's just a guess

sorry njsg tacos happened

i am back now

wpsdlocal6.com/news/kentucky-news/f…43-317f-57a5-8731-6b4750a1935b.html no bug to report here, but do notice the <title> tag on that site

someone tried to serve HTML there... why?!

but it gets better: <title>Flood damage at Noah’s Ark attraction in Kentucky | &lt;span class=&quot;tnt-section-tag no-link&quot;&gt;Kentucky News&lt;/span&gt; | WPSD Local 6</title>

how considerate of them, they escaped it :P

no, wait, WHY THERE IS HTML-LIKE CODE INSIDE A <title> TAG!?

"So, first things first, if your application produces markup like that, please leave the software industry immediately. Your work is a net negative on everyone's lives. Tools down, walk away. "

Thanks, Zawinski!

lol

Tirili:

er

tomman:

wonder if such a markup can be exploitable on specific *nix desktop environments

or cellphone junk

tomman: I'm guessing some rule grabbed the in-content title to make the title, and then the markup was updated to have more spans....

uh, funny

metadata doesn't show the same for other title-like fields (Page info dialog, first tab)

I was wondering if this could maybe be "it works for facebook etc"

here is an icon I and an autocomplete chatbot made i.ibb.co/ZGMLX28/image.png