17:06:16 MattATobin Hi. Is the xref gone? thereisonlyxulorg seems to be defunct. 17:08:04 need to leave for now. bbl 17:18:48 what 17:18:52 it shouldn't be gone 17:22:35 oh ffs 17:25:04 frg and everyone my deepest appologies.. It seems the domain actually expired today and I thought I had all those first of the month expires shifted.. Either way I payed the xul bill so xul should be resuming soon automagically! 17:25:48 I have been deep into .. THE LINUX.. so guess I need to pay more attention to other stuffs again. 17:38:33 cross-reference seems to be resolving again http://xr.thereisonlyxul.org/ but the mainsite has to wait until their parking page dns entries expire 17:58:49 in other news, IBM/RH effectively served X11's execution order this week 17:58:54 how that affects us? 17:59:15 (aside of "well, XWayland hasn't been sent to the death row yet") 18:08:31 tomman: The correct name for that is Weston. 18:09:01 is a town adjacent to Wayland 18:11:54 tomman: just sayin' the corrct term for the Wayland shim to support X11 apps is called Weston and NOT XWayland. 18:22:36 tomman: it is basically pointless for you to weeks later confirm crap I told you about weeks prior 18:23:00 just a tip if you can reallocate effort into stuff I don't tell everyone 18:23:11 MattATobin: well, we already knew that, but it wasn't until this week where it finally got officially confirmed :/ 18:23:18 lol 18:23:25 maybe I know more than most do 18:23:40 not JUST from my keen extraporlating worst case bs 18:24:20 like actual things because i heard about it before it was commonly announced cause I pay attention to projects and people 18:27:37 now what I am telling you is what I said at the time the decision has already been made and what I been hinting at is that we should make a stand on xwayland cause it IS an xorg impl and the xfce guy is largely heading it up so I am far more hopeful that it will not be a piss poor x app compat layer but fully capable as an xserver and the hope THERE is that if that is proven then maybe wayland can be paired down into something more 18:27:37 like a thinner abstraction layer between X and the kernel and JUST do shit x kinda sucks at 18:27:45 like compositing 18:28:04 either that or give us actual 2d accelerator chips on graphics cards again and piss off with the new hotness lol 18:28:07 right tomman 18:29:34 have your two triangles, one offscreen buffer, and have fun with that 18:30:09 bitch i been assembling an openbox environemnt and using picom 18:30:43 when xwayland is capable of THAT i will accept it as my own personal jesus christ 18:30:49 and that IS gonna happen 18:31:12 no matter if gnome or wayland its self likes it or not 18:31:40 because wayland as-is is just not acceptable beyond the exact livecd configuration IF it runs on your hardware 18:31:48 there is the other problem: GNOME 18:32:07 from what I've read, there are two leading Wayland implementations: GNOME and "everything else" 18:32:20 "everything else" does rights more or less OK, within the broken Wayland specs 18:32:28 gnome fancies its self THE linux de and toolkit 18:32:35 but GNOME is... yeah, "what do you mean you want to run 3rd party apps on it?!" 18:32:46 and during gnome2 they were FULLY FUCKING JUSTIFIED 18:32:54 not so much now 18:33:04 so I think there are some solutions and no i don't mean xul 18:33:15 so not only we have a broken protocol where "your use case does not exist", we also have a leading implementation where nothing works except what is written by them 18:33:30 qt would be the best toolkit ever except for that damned mobile web not-xul qml shit 18:33:53 tomman: yes and now we are all gonna fix it somehow 18:34:03 because it is at the point where even they are starting to question 18:34:07 i have SEEN it happening 18:34:20 Anyway, my position on all this is "X11 is the hill I'm gonna die on" and I'll be avoiding Wayland like the pest as hard as I can 18:34:55 my hardware is aging anyway, so I guess it's matter of time... 18:34:55 you won't be able to and it won't matter if nothing EXCEPT xorg is using the wayland client and I would very much like to have a hand in esuring THAT happens 18:35:12 also X11 is not one implimentation 18:35:13 xorg is 18:35:16 xwayland is 18:35:20 and xfre86 was 18:35:24 well, read X11 as in "X.org" :D 18:35:28 yes 18:35:33 and you seriously shouldn't 18:35:39 like when you read Mozilla as Firefox 18:35:54 that shouldn't BE how people percieve it 18:36:03 and that is one key thing to try and alter 18:37:02 the IDEAL outcome if no xorg which btw xorg as an organization barely exists.. is for wayland to be paired down to serve xwayland and everything else shat into gnome modules that no one else but they and maybe cinnamon use 18:37:12 and force them to keep x11 support 18:37:34 but even a MESSURE of that ideal result is far better than the prosects even a year ago on this wayland bs 18:37:36 tomman: 18:39:43 although if "The Squash" hadn't held his gtk2 vaporfork and not the good kind of vapor that creates waves of old 90s and 80s cg shit but the bad kind where other people don't bother because they think someone is gonna handle it.. 18:40:04 cause he went EVERYWHERE touting this project 18:40:13 everywhere people were pissed and ready to do something 18:40:55 till he came in said all the crap they wanted to hear and then slowly pissed off when his bs became obvious 18:41:57 anyway if the xulorg ain't resolving flush your dns cache everything is resolving with fresh records and the xref source has been kicked