02:19:15 <NewTobinParadigm> tomman: mozilla died long ago
02:19:38 <NewTobinParadigm> you should quit now while you still have your life and somewhat of a choice
02:28:57 <IsambardPrince> I must have missed something.
02:30:19 <IsambardPrince> If you have a job that's paying you, better stay put and save anything you can.
02:30:24 <IsambardPrince> Before the Biden Miracle gets you.
14:18:48 <tomman> https://teenage.engineering/products/tp-7 => won't render anything but a blank page
14:19:01 <tomman> console sez: SyntaxError: An invalid or illegal string was specified te013-18550e0b-9855-4ec1-a9ce-88594184d281.js:1
14:19:20 <tomman> and line 1 is... "use strict";
14:20:22 <tomman> ...but that's old as dirt
14:21:15 <tomman> ...ah, line 1 is that plus several kilobytes of minified vomit
14:21:24 <tomman> "Teenager" engineering, of course
14:23:09 <frg_Away> looks like class fields
14:24:59 <frg_Away> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Classes/Private_class_fields
14:25:17 <frg_Away> but private class members can be created by using a hash # prefix
14:27:15 <njsg> <+tomman> ...ah, line 1 is that plus several kilobytes of minified vomit <- Bertie Botts coding?
14:27:27 <njsg> maybe those are the Beans of Javascript
14:28:43 <tomman> I guess the ECMAScript committee feared that if they brought the keyword "private", either Oracle would sue them, or it would offend someone, or some other baseless reason
14:35:46 <njsg> (logbot down?)
14:36:13 <njsg> (or perhaps it's the name that isn't resolving?)
14:37:38 <njsg> ok, I'm chalking it down to DNS, 8.8.8.8 gives a working address for it.