00:09:07 <franstam> why cant they use use standard html???? i remember when i learnt it in school even my windows 95 browsers handle it properly
00:28:59 <tomman> franstam: even worse: the site STILL looks like the same as it has been for the last... 15 years?
00:29:38 <tomman> but for whatever reason it now relies on a metric pile of JavaScript, and it looks like someone just updated their framenotworks™ and are Testing in Production®
00:30:38 <tomman> also... ugh, image lazy loading has been took up there to the extreme
00:30:52 <tomman> does JavaScript break or is it disabled? Then you get NO IMAGES, simple as that!
00:33:39 <franstam> i dunno, ietf and those linux man pages work perfectly fine and are simple webpages
00:34:27 <franstam> sometimes those javascript are in place to prevent people from scraping and downloading all their images
00:39:05 <tomman> What I mean is: why messing with the backend if the site is gonna look the same? Just leave the old code in place, it works!
00:39:27 <tomman> ...and this brings me back to https://cerebralab.com/Imaginary_Problems_Are_the_Root_of_Bad_Software
01:12:46 <franstam> https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/06/16/1732242/eu-votes-to-bring-back-replaceable-phone-batteries
04:48:00 <njsg> js-based lazy loading has struck me as a problem possibly being addressed on the wrong side
04:48:53 <njsg> "why messing with the backend if the site is gonna look the same?" <-- I'm guessing it could be SEO for google, too
04:49:07 <njsg> although I'm not really aware of the scoring they do lately
07:13:26 <Jindam> Is it possible to compile seamonkey for armv7l?
08:20:19 <GrannyGoose> No