Hello, is anyone here able to help me with a Chatzilla issue?

For some reason my client is ignoring users with +B usermode, and I want to fix that

If there's anyone who knows what to do, please ping me

Nice... Just like the good old days! arstechnica.com/information-technol…rs-root-on-every-major-linux-distro

For those who use Linux, you can have fun by checking out the code from the link under "PoC code has been released by another source" in the above.

So, if you have unpriviledged shell user access and the same time have "pkexec" utility, pls do "chmod 0755 /usr/bin/pkexec" and then make sure to update the "polkit" package from your distro (must be ready today).

(If you've experimented, don't forget to remove "GCONV_PATH=." and "lol" subdirs at your homedir).

It seems that someone has burned a trustworthy for years exploit, not considering that in a modern system each such attempt leaves enough traces, and the openness of the source code inevitably leads to quick detection and correction.

Dear hackers! Use exploits in proprietary, paid and licensed code! Then users will not be able to identify and fix the problem on their own, The restoring from a backup will not help (because paid software remains the same) and they will go to withdraw cash from an ATM for you... </sarcasm>

goes back to this buc lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/li…ad/ZDZACAMG2E3P4K4P2CVBQ3XBBZ7CYSXA

Hey, I'm planning to download the latest SeaMonkey release. Is there also a GPG signature for the release packages?

Okay, apparently, there isn't. So, could you provide that? That would be really great.

msiism we currently do not provide gpg signatures. Checksums are in archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.53.10.2/SHA512SUMS.txt

The Windows versions are now signed too.

Okay, good to know.

So, are there plans to provide GPG signatures in the future?

/win 23