00:17:44 Since 2.53.9, no more "Unresponsive script" dialog appears (after about 10 sec of 100% cpu) on urls like https://www.dw.com/de/spaniens-erster-lockdown-war-verfassungswidrig/a-58270280 . The same for 2.53.9.1 . So now no any chances other than to kill the program. Any plans for this regression? 00:29:52 autoupdater now works, it seems pieces are falling on their respective places at this hour~ 00:34:49 tomman: updated to 2.53.9.1? 00:37:28 ewong: we'll see after the restart 00:41:11 ewong: update successful to 2.53.9.1 here~ 00:41:28 I guess the homepage hasn't been updated yet 00:42:38 tomman: doing that right now 01:09:02 topic should be updated 13:16:59 buc looks like a race condition. Not your usual script warning. 2.57 affected too. 16:16:25 ...wait, Chatzilla switched from emoticon images to colored emojis to... black and white emojis?! 16:16:38 <2.53.8: images 16:16:47 2.53.8~2.53.9: colorful emojis 16:16:54 2.53.9.1: monochrome emojis 16:17:01 not that I care, but what's going on? 16:19:09 I get colored emojis if I switch to serif font 16:19:40 switching to "sans-serif", "helvetica", or "arial" (my current setup) now fallbacks to monochrome emojis since 2.53.9.1 16:19:42 ...odd 16:20:01 (in 2.53.9, "arial" gave me colorful faces) 16:27:06 Hmm :) 16:28:00 and wh7 would the fot have anyting to do with colr exactly? 16:28:19 color 16:28:30 Hey Guys 16:28:40 tomman Color here with sans-serif and Arial. 2.53.9.1 switched default to sans-serif for better readability in mail. 16:28:55 Just fixing my website IRC, so just around :) 16:28:56 trying again, why would the font have anything to do with color? 16:29:10 I only get color with serif 16:29:47 tomman which os ? 16:30:13 frg_Away: Debian (old)stable, aka Debian 10 16:30:29 (haven't moved yet to Debian 11 on this machine, but Soon™) 16:30:52 can test on Debian 11 if you want 16:30:56 tomman then it is the font there. 16:31:46 Now uses stock unicode icons 16:33:39 thanks for 2.53.9.1 :-) 16:33:39 Switch back to serif and you have the old behavior. See bug 1727982. pref changes only and you can switch them back if it bothers you. 16:34:02 2.53.9 on Debian 11 shows color emojis with Arial too 16:34:09 now updating that to .1 16:35:31 testing :-) 16:36:44 testing :) 16:37:27 Hmmm, got something curious 16:37:35 test :) :( :/ :D 16:37:42 sad face IS colorful 16:37:49 all other faces are monochrome 16:38:08 (same behavior on Debian 11 after the update to 2.53.9.1, too) 16:38:15 let's try messing with the prefs then 16:41:02 yup, "font.default.x-western" does the trick 16:41:11 between old & new cZ, emoji's are certainly different, https://i.postimg.cc/Rh9jBpx9/c-Z-emoiji-s.png 16:41:12 switch that back to serif, and you'll get colored emojis 16:41:13 i would have never guessed the smile was a smile in current cZ 16:41:15 unable to get b&w on my end, Win7 16:41:42 old cZ used actual pictures, not Unicode fun 16:42:05 IIRC the switch to Unicode emojis began with 2.53.8 or .9, can't remember 16:42:41 frg_Away: thanks for the tip there 16:43:14 Arial has no emojis (or Unicode coverage in general, really), so I guess the emojis indeed comes from whatever defaults your OS have 16:43:29 and controlled by the default pref, am I right? 16:43:59 switching the default for x-western forces the OS to lookup for emojis elsewhere, and I guess I get blessed with the colorful emoji lottery 16:44:17 very interesting behavior 16:48:41 Yeah it is a bit of voodoo. I already put tons of fixes in but more to come. twemoji is shipped in the last version but seem not to be used here. 16:48:43 https://twitter.github.io/twemoji/2/test/preview.html 16:52:04 ouch, that page slows down SM heavily while it loads! 16:52:22 life was easier when "emoji" was something that only existed on Japanese cellphones... 16:54:07 I liked the old icons better but now we can support new ones without starting a drawing contest and shipping them.