-
frg_Awaybuc Funny bug day. Archiving newsgroup messages seem to lock the folder. Already in 2.49.5 and also in TB 78. Seems to be in shared coded and needs a restart to unblock it. Might be related if something is not coming to an end. Anyway tomorrow is another day. Nighty night.
-
» IanN_Away briefly looks round
-
» IanN[m] looks back
-
» njsg looks
-
a-865Google thinks 2.49.5 is a bot now, too often prompting me to answer I am not a robot :(
-
a-865NVM
-
a-865wrong tab
-
a-865Google thinks 2.49.5 is a bot now, too often prompting me to answer I am not a robot :(
-
tommanI thought Google believed that Seamonkey was now a cellphone...
-
tommanhaven't bothered resetting my UA override for Google since I'm on a Real Computerâ„¢
-
a-865gettr.com produces nothing but white in the viewport.
-
tomman> SyntaxError: expected expression, got keyword 'import' 2.8d189ded.chunk.js:2:3102817
-
tommanfound a clue here: zadam/trilium #648
-
tommanapparently there is a name collision somewhere in their sea of Javascript vomit with an actual keyword, but that's supposed to work on "modern"/Chrome browsers
-
tommansomething similar: forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?t=24899
-
tommanso yeah, it's some newfangled Javascript module thing
-
tomman
-
tommanmore precisely, dynamic module loading, aka import('more/javascript/vomit.js')
-
WG9sso it turns out checking for CPU_TYPE being arm in the media/webrtc/trunk/moz.build was definitely incorrect CPU_TYPE=arm implies a 32-bit arm processor and for 64 bit th3e CPU_TYPE is aarch64
-
WG9s\was wondering if you could test the patch at wg9s.com/comm-253-de/patches/WIP-9999999-aarch64-support.patch and see if building with that works. I would try witch both --enable-webrtc and --disable-webrtc
-
WG9sI am still unable to get cross-compiles to work properly so can;t do my own testing here
-
a-865
-
WG9stomman: actually checking for a bot more often probably means you don't allow cookies for the site. I bet if you enabled cookies it would only ask this once and then next time would not ask because a cookie would say you already did this.
-
WG9sfrg_Away: have you looked into the autoconf thing to determine how it is supposed to work? seems to me it is chicken and egg issue won;t have a builtin autoconf working untill after build step which is dependent on configure step which is dependent on a working autoconf
-
WG9soops wrong channel
-
WG9sso perhaps for building on aarch64 still needs the scops patch
-
WG9sperhaps I should jusrt land all 3 changes
-
WG9s1 is for building under aarch64 and two for building with target of aarch64 so perhaps split into two patches?