14:41:49 <frg_Away> Status meeting notes have been updated. Sorry for the delay. Busy week.
14:41:51 <frg_Away> https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey%2FStatusMeetings%2F2021-06-27
14:41:52 <frg_Away> https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey%2FStatusMeetings%2F2021-06-27&type=revision&diff=1236423&oldid=1236400
22:28:45 <buc> The bug 1718839 and potential need to yet another .1 fixing release is frustrating. :(
22:28:45 <buc> It would be nice for developers to treat their (nicely formatted) patches with the same degree of vigilance and validation as they would treat others.
22:28:51 <buc> Anyway, to mitigate the negative effect, developers could apply several well-tested patches, pending for months for their attention. </sarcasm>
22:30:56 * IanN_Away checks his review queue
22:56:42 <frg_Away> buc this was uncalled for.  I like your contributions but not your attitude. We have a work flow for patches thru bugzilla and if you don't care about it this is your problem. I will usually not pick random random snipplets for inclusion and I will not endorse putting unreviewed patches in official versions ditribution or ours. The unofficial versions are the playing ground for these and can...
22:56:43 <frg_Away> ...be fixed quickly if problems appear. And as you see even reviewed patches might generate problems and regressions. Personally I hope that people would test the beta versions more. Second time in a row we had incident because no one tested. Neither me nor IanN or one of the other devs find everything.